Daniel 11:4-30

The King who stirred up the Antichrist

In verses 2-3, we read about the King who stirred up the Third Beast, the Greeks.

In verses 4-30, we will see how the Greek empire stirred up the Antichrist, as we first read in Daniel 8:8-9:

“in place of it (Alexander’s Kingdom), four notable ones came up toward the four winds/spirits of heaven, and out of one of them came a little horn.”

The King who stirred up the Antichrist was Antiochus Epiphanes, who joined himself with “the Prince of Covenant,” only to be grieved by humiliation from Rome, and his “heart was moved against the holy covenant” (Daniel 11:28, 30).

A lot of prophecy is necessary to explain Antiochus Epiphanes. The Angel makes prophecies about almost all the Seleucid Kings, “the Kings of the North,” leading up to Antiochus Epiphanes, just as he prophesied the Persian kings who preceded Xerses 1. The Angel prophecies many details about the Greek kings, and therefore, there are many skeptics who believe this prophecy was written after the facts were known. But, our oldest record of this prophecy comes from the Greek Septuagint, which was translated in the third century BC; long before this prophecy was fulfilled.

We need to give a brief overview of the Greek world, and the King of the North and South described in these verses, to understand the Angel’s prophecy. The King of the North is the King of the Seleucid Empire (Syria), which is north of Israel. The King of the South, is the King of the Ptolemaic Empire (Egypt).

The rulers of these two Kingdoms were:

Seleucid Kings (of North)

Seleucus 1 Nicator (320 – 281 BC)
Antiochos 1 Soter (281-261 BC)
Antiochus II Theos (261-246 BC)
Seleucus II Calinicus (246 – 225 BC)
Seleucus III Ceranus (225-223 BC)
Antiochus the Great (223 – 187 BC)
Seleucus IV Philopator (187 – 175 BC)
Antiochus IV Epiphanes (175 – 163 BC)

Ptoelmaic Kings (of South)

Ptolemy I Soter (303–282 BC)
Ptolemy II Philadelphus (285–246 BC)
Ptolemy III Euergetes (246–221 BC)
Ptolemy IV Philopator (221–203 BC)
Ptolemy V Epiphanes (203–181 BC)
Ptolemy VI Philometor (181–145 BC)

Seleucus 1 Nicator (320 – 281 BC)

Dan 11:4
his kingdom…shall be divided toward the four winds of heaven – as described in Daniel 7:6; 8:8, these are the four kingdoms that came out of Alexander the Great’s Kingdom.

but not among his posterity – not to his descendants, but rather to four generals

Dan 11:5
the King of the South shall become strong – the Ptolemaic empire, beginning with Ptolemy I Soter (303–282 BC), the General of Alexander

as well as one of his princes – meaning captains, SAR, another one of Alexander’s Generals,

and he shall gain power over him – the King of the North, Seleucus 1 Nicator (320 – 281 BC), shall be much greater than the King of the South

Antiochus II Theos (261-246 BC)

Dan 11:6
And at the end of some years – more than 20 years later

they will form an alliance, for the daughter… – the King of the South, Ptolemy II Philadelphus (285–246 BC), gave his daughter Berenice to Antiochus II Theos (261-246 BC)

but she shall not retain the power of her authority – after Ptolemy II Philadelphus died, Antiochus II Theos, divorced Berenice, and he returned to his original wife, Laodice. But she poisoned Antiochus, and also caused Berenice and her son to be put to death; so that her own son, Seleucus II Calinicus, would receive the throne. 1

Seleucus II Calinicus (246 – 225 BC)

Dan 11:7
but one in the branch of her roots shall shall arise in his place – the brother of Berenice, Ptolemy III Euergetes (246–221 BC), succeeded Ptolemy II Philadelphus

who shall come with an army – to revenge the death of Berenice, he attacked Syria, whose King was now Seleucus II Calinicus (246 – 225 BC)

and deal with them –  the third Syrian War (246 – 241 BC).

Dan 11:8
and he shall carry their gods captive to Egypt – he reclaimed the idols of Egypt that were taken by Syria

and shall continue more years than the King of the North – he lived 4 years longer than Seleucus II Calinicus (246 – 225 BC). The Hebrew reads: “And he (more) years (than) King of the North.” The Greek Septuagint reads: “and he shall last longer than the king of the north.”

Dan 11:9
the king of the North shall come to the kingdom – the Hebrew reads “shall come into his Kingdom (of the North), and return to his own land (back to the South).” The Septuagint says, “The King of Egypt shall enter into (his) kingdom certain days and return to his land.”

Antiochus the Great (223 – 187 BC)

Dan 11:10
his sons shall stir up strife – the two sons of the King of the North Seleucus II Calinicus (246 – 225 BC); who were Seleucus III Ceranus (225-223 BC), and Antiochus the Great (223 – 187 BC)

and one shall certainly come and overwhelm – Antiochus the Great was that one

Dan 11:11-12
assemble a multitude – Antioch the Great had seventy thousand infantry and five thousand cavalry;

the multitude shall be given into his hand – Ptolemy was the victor

he will cast down ten of thousands – literally “ten thousand” – a myriad, ten thousand were slain by Ptolemy IV Philopator (221–203 BC), at the battle of Raphia, one of the largest battles of the Ancient world.

Dan 11:13-15
for the King of the North will return at the end of some years – Antiochus, the Great, attacked Ptolemy V Epiphanes (203–181 BC), in the Battle of Panium, Mount Panium, in 200 BC.

violet men of your people – Josephus in, “Antiquites,” Book. xii. ch. iii. Section 3. says: “The Jews of their own accord, went over to him, and received him (Antiochus) into the city (Jerusalem), and gave plentiful provision to his army, and to his elephants, and readily assisted him when he besieged the garrison which was in the citadel of Jerusalem.”

in fulfillment of the vision – the Angel foresees that the Jews will help to make this vision come to pass, because they will be supporters of Antiochus.

but they shall fall – they will bring trouble on themselves as noted in verse 16.

and build a seige mound –  Zeno’s account of the battle: “the right extremity of his line, together with a few cavalry, rested on the slope of the mountain; while its left with all the cavalry belonging to this wing, was in the plains below…The younger Antiochus charged down from the high ground and put to flight and pursued the cavalry under Ptolemy.”

and capture a fortified City –  Ceasarea Philippi:

Dan 11:16
he shall stand in the Glorious land
– his army built a temple to Pan, who was a god of desolated places, music and goat herds at Paneas.

Dan 11:17
to enter with the strength of his kingdom – he desired to enlarge his power

he shall give him the daughter of women to destroy it – he gave his daughter Cleopatra to Ptolemy V Epiphanes (203–181 BC) in the hopes of expanding his power.

but she shall not stand with him – she sided with her husband, the King of Egypt.

Dan 11:18
he shall turn his face to the coastlands – Antiochos, the Great, made war with the Romans, the Roman–Seleucid War (192–188 BC).

but a ruler shall bring the reproach – literally, a captain, SAR, who was the famous Roman Gereral Scipio Asiaticus. The resulting treaty of Apamea, which heavily restricted the Seleucids to have ships, or sail West, and also required the payment of substantial money to Rome, that would finally be repaid by Antiochus IV Epiphanes (175 – 163 BC).

Dan 11:19
then he shall turn back toward…his own land and stumble – this surrender caused the outlying provinces of the Seleucid Empire to rebel.  Antiochus was killed in 187 BC while pillaging a temple in Persia.

Seleucus IV Philopator (187 – 175 BC)

Dan 11:20
there shall arise in his place one who imposes taxes on the glorious kingdom – Seleucus IV Philopator (187 – 175 BC), who was compelled by the heavy war-indemnity of Rome, to collect money to pay the Romans, and sent his minister Heliodorus to Jerusalem to seize the Jewish temple treasury.

Antiochus IV Epiphanes (175 – 163 BC)

Dan 11:21
in his place shall arise a vile person – Antiochus IV Epiphanes (175 – 163 BC), whose name actually means “god incarnate” – Zuess incarnate. One who shall be described in detail.

to whom they will not give the honour of royalty – Antiochus IV Epiphanes was the younger son of Antiochus the Great. The older son was Seleucus IV, and his legimate heir was Demetrius I Soter, who was still a hostage in Rome. Antiochus IV Epiphanes seized the throne with the help of King Eumenes II of Pergamum, and proclaimed himself co-regent with another son of Seleucus, an infant named Antiochus, whom he murdered a few years later.

but shall come peaceably and seize the kingdom by intrigue – as described above.

Dan 11:22
with the force of a flood they shall be swept away – verses 22 to 24, are a summary of the attacks, and politics of Antiochus Epiphanes against Egypt, who wins “with a small number” in comparison to the ” very great and mighty army” of the King of the South, that is described in verse 25. Antiochus succeeds by deception, and the poor advisors of the King of the South. Antiochus will prevail, “only for a time.”

also the prince of the covenant – in the Book of Daniel, the word “nagid” only otherwise appears in the Angel’s explanation of Daniel 9:25-27, where the Ruler of the People to come, the Ruler of Rome, the Antichrist, was called “the Ruler” (Nagid) who makes “a covenant with many.” The prophecy of the scripture of truth, as mentioned in Daniel 10:20-21, is also about the battle of the Captains of Angels. One of whom, was Satan, who at that time, like Christ, was only one of the chief captains. The one third of Angels did not follow Satan, until the birth of Christ (Revelation 12:4), at this time he was still only the Captain of the Armies of Rome. This “busy” Captain of the Armies of Rome, was kept busy by the Captain of Greece, and was also swept away by Antiochus’ attack. He was unable to defend Egypt. The Angel making this prophecy, explained the busy work of war, at first to Daniel, when he said “the Captain of the Prince of Persia withstood me 21 days….” (Daniel 10:12-13).

Did Rome have a covenant with Egypt? Yes indeed, history shows that it did.

Prior to Antiochus’ attack on Egypt, both Antiochus and Ptolemy sent embassies to the Roman senate to present their right to attack one another 2.  At this time, Rome was planning an attack on Greece, and was happy with the idea of an Egypt-Syria war, because this war, would keep both Syria, and Egypt from coming to the aid of Greece.

After Rome attacked Greece in 171 BC, Antiochus made his attack on Egypt, in 170 BC. Antiochus conquered Egypt “with a flood”, and made Ptolemy IV his “co-ruler,” and then returned to Syria. Some say that Antiochus made Ptolemy a kind a “puppet ruler” to avoid pressure from Rome.

After Ptolemy IV tried to regain his control of the Egypt, Antiochus made another attack on Egypt in 168 BC. Rome while still busy with Egypt. Egypt pleaded for Rome’s protection, but no help came.

But after Rome’s victory, in Greece, Roman Ambassador Gaius Popillius Laenas, sailed from Cyprus to confront Antiochus, in Alexandria, and demanded that Antiochus withdraw from Egypt. When Antiochus refused to commit, Laenas drew a line in the sand around Antiochus, and demanded that Antiochus give him an answer before he crossed the line, or he would bring the matter to the Roman senate. Indeed, Rome did have a covenant with Egypt. But, the Captain of Rome, Satan, was too busy fighting with the forces of Greece. He was also “swept away” by the initial attack of Antiochus. Our big hint regarding the delayed Captain of Rome, came in Daniel 10:13. The Angel, who explained the “scripture of truth” to Daniel, said that he tried to come to Daniel right away, but the Captain of the King of Persia withstood him for 21 days.

Dan 11:23
and after a league is made with him he shall act deceitfully – after joining with Satan, “the Prince of the Covenant.”

he shall become strong with a small number – he will succeed against a greater army, through his deceit.

Dan 11:24
he shall do what his fathers have not done – to conquer Egypt etc.

Dan 11:25
he shall stir up his power and courage – with Rome busy fighting in Greece, in 170 AD, Antiochus gained the courage for his first attack on Egypt, with lesser forces.

and the King of the South…shall not stand – Egypt was defeated, despite having a stronger army.

Dan 11:26
those who eat of the portion of his delicacies shall destroy him – the King of the South, was not well advised, or supported. The poor adviser to Ptolemy may even have been Cleopatra, Antiochus’ brother.

Dan 11:27
both Kings shall…speak lies at the same table – in the “peace” negotiations at Alexandria and Memphis

the end will still be at the appointed time – there will be no good result from their negotiations, Antiochus will attack again in 168 AD.

Dan 11:28
his heart shall be moved against the holy covenant – the Angel explains what will happen at the appointed time: after being humiliated by Gaius Popillius Laneas, Antiochus will make an attack on Jerusalem.

Dan 11:29-30
At the appointed time he shall return – to make a second attack on Egypt, in 170 AD.

But it shall not be like former or latter – not like the first attack, or the latter attack in Daniel 11:42-43

For ships from Cyprus shall come against him…and he shall be grieved – these are the Romans ships, and Gaius Popillius Laenas. Here, Daniel emphasized the end of the Greek Empire by the Romans,and the folly of Antiochus IV Epiphanes. In 168 BC, the Romans divided Greece into four Roman states, and controlled the world, as the new “the King of the North.” The Hebrew word “Kittam” used here, bears the strongest meaning as Cypress, an astounding prophecy of the Roman intervention by Laenas.

and return in rage against the holy covenant and do damage – Antiochus attacked Jerusalem, after Menelaus was overthrown by Jason, the first high priest, who Antiochus had appointed. According to the Book of Maccabees:

There was a massacre of young and old, a killing of women and children, a slaughter of virgins and infants. In the space of three days, eighty thousand were lost, forty thousand meeting a violent death, and the same number being sold into slavery.

2 Maccabees 5:11–14


  1.  Justinus: Epitome of Pompeius Trogus’ Philippic Histories, Book 27.1
  2. E.R.Bevan, House of Ptolemy, pg 285